Oct 20, 2026 earnings call — Deposit remix, credit cleanup, and buybacks
Company reduced high-cost deposits and improved asset quality while PPNR grew 6% to $419 million.
Revenue $1.0B (est $1.0B) · EPS $2.45 (est $2.42)
Key quotes
"Nonaccrual loans declined 14% or $77 million from the prior quarter to $485 million exceeding the expectations outlined in our guidance update last month."
"Deposit optimization is now expected to total at least $5 billion by year end."
"In Q3, we repurchased shares of $92 million against our $150 million target for the second half of 2026, representing approximately 1.15 million shares or roughly 1% of shares outstanding."
Analyst Q&A 13
deposit optimization and mortgage deposits
Q (David Feaster · Raymond James): Analyst asked how remaining $500 million optimization affects ability to fund loan growth with lower cost deposits, and how mortgage market changes affect mortgage deposits.
A: Management said they expect growth from several lower-cost deposit channels like HOA, corporate trust, and business escrow services. They noted mortgage deposit volumes could slow if mortgage industry slows, but private label securitizations (PLS) help keep low-cost deposits and reduce MSR balance.
"Those channels for the most part are at a much lower cost basis." — Kenneth A. Vecchione (CEO·CHAIR)
expense outlook and fee income
Q (Matthew Clark · Piper Sandler): Analyst asked where expense relief will come from versus Q3, and asked to confirm implied Q4 fee income range including securities gains.
A: Management said Q3 expenses rose due to structural investments in deposits, AI, and hiring; some benefits from replacing consultants will show in early 2027 and noninterest expense should decline in Q4. On fee income, they said guidance includes securities gains, expect mortgage revenue to be about $70 million and Q4 fee income likely lower than Q3.
"When you look at the noninterest expense excluding the deposit cost, I do think you will see a reduction in the fourth quarter given some of the things we did in the third quarter." — Vishal Idnani (CFO)
normalized net charge-offs and expenses
Q (Jared Shaw · Barclays Capital): Analyst asked whether normalized net charge-offs will be 25 to 35 bps after resolving the last 2 credits, and whether Q4 non-ECR expenses normalize or set a new base.
A: Management confirmed normalized net charge-offs remain in that target range once credits are resolved. They said noninterest expenses excluding deposit fees should decline in Q4 versus Q3 and that Q3 is not the new run rate for expense growth.
"The expenses ex deposit fees will be down in the fourth quarter." — Vishal Idnani (CFO)
how NPLs were resolved and REO plans
Q (Ben Gerlinger · Citi): Analyst asked how the resolved credits were removed (sale, equity, seller financing) and whether more REO dispositions are expected.
A: Management said the prior 4 credits were removed by sale of assets off the books and moved outside the bank, without seller financing. They said REO is used strategically, typically contributes more revenue than expenses, is marked to market, and they take properties back, improve them, then sell them.
"The 4 that we have been mentioning and tracking, were ultimately sale of assets off the books and moved outside of the bank." — Kenneth A. Vecchione (CEO·CHAIR)
margin outlook and long-term growth plan
Q (Timur Braziler · UBS): Analyst asked if Q4 margin guidance follows historical 3–4 bps seasonal decline and what the company’s next step is after deposit optimization for loan and deposit growth.
A: Management said Q4 guidance aligns with historical seasonal patterns where mortgage-related deposits exit and are temporarily replaced with higher-cost borrowings, causing 3–4 bps NIM impact. For the future, they plan more moderate loan growth aimed at top-quartile peer performance and will provide more specifics at the Q4 call; excess capital will be used to buy shares assuming current prices.
"The Q4 guide is more directed to what has happened in this company historically." — Kenneth A. Vecchione (CEO·CHAIR)
timing for target RoTCE and buybacks
Q (Chris McGratty · KBW): Analyst asked timing to reach 16%–17% RoTCE and sustainability of current buyback levels.
A: Management said they still expect the RoTCE target in about 2 to 2.5 years and are pursuing several initiatives like treasury management to help get there. On buybacks, they will consider final Basel III rules and an 11% CET1 target before deciding buyback size, but they will buy shares if price is attractive.
"There are a couple of things that we will consider as we go forward and come out of 2026 into 2027." — Kenneth A. Vecchione (CEO·CHAIR)
sources of loan growth and NIM seasonality
Q (David Smith · Truist): Analyst asked which loan types will drive the planned loan growth and whether deposit optimization reduces historical Q4 NIM seasonality.
A: Management said HFI loan growth came from regional banking, hotel, franchise finance, tech and innovation, supported by MSR lending and note finance, and expects those same areas to drive future volume. They cautioned there remain warehouse lending deposits that will seasonally roll off and require borrowings, so some seasonality persists.
"That growth supported by MSR lending and note finance offset a mild decline in warehouse lending as mortgage production slowed." — Kenneth A. Vecchione (CEO·CHAIR)
reserve ratio direction
Q (Timothy R. Bruckner · RBC): Analyst asked where reserves should trend and whether they will continue to build the reserve ratio.
A: Management compared their ACL of 93 basis points to peer reserves around 1.18% and said they do not target an absolute reserve level. They adjust reserves through CECL stress testing and added overlays this quarter for higher rate and macro uncertainty, and they expect reserve ratio to rise about 2 bps per quarter as loan mix shifts toward C&I.
strategy on moderate growth vs faster growth
Q (Jon Arfstrom · Truist): Analyst asked whether the company is comfortable with mid- to high-single-digit loan growth plus buybacks or if moderation is holding back the business.
A: Management said they believe the moderated, more selective growth strategy is appropriate to improve returns and valuation, noting long-term track record and better asset quality metrics. They said the strategy lets the bank be more selective and generate higher spreads on loans while growing fee and deposit businesses in desirable segments.
"We are reevaluating how best to get valuation higher in this company, and we were not getting rewarded for that excess growth above the peer group." — Kenneth A. Vecchione (CEO·CHAIR)
deposit beta and NPL outlook
Q (Casey Haire · Autonomous): Analyst asked expected blended deposit beta next cycle, and asked how much further NPLs can decline given rising rates.
A: Management estimated a blended cumulative deposit beta of about 65% over the next year, with nonmaturity excluding ECR at 55–60% and ECR deposits about 70–75%, noting warehouse deposits approach 90–100% beta. They said they have high confidence NPLs will continue to drop through year-end because two remaining credits are scheduled to complete soon.
"We are currently expecting our blended cumulative deposit beta to be about 65% over the next year, and that includes both the non deposits and the ECR related deposits." — Vishal Idnani (CFO)
loan competition and remaining deposit optimization
Q (Janet Lee · TD Cowen): Analyst asked about competition on the lending side and whether $5 billion more to optimize deposits is sufficient or could be revisited.
A: Management said lending is competitive and they evaluate relationships on total relationship income, not just loan yield, and they are pleased with results in targeted segments. On deposit optimization, they said $5 billion seems appropriate now, they accelerated transition without losing customers or loans, and they will pause and reassess after year-end.
"Right now, the $5 billion seems like the appropriate number." — Kenneth A. Vecchione (CEO·CHAIR)
class action settlements and option income
Q (Bernard Von Gizycki · Deutsche Bank): Analyst asked timing of class action banking settlements affecting fees and whether covered-call option income occurred this quarter and will continue.
A: Management said expected class action settlement-related fee upside is really a 2027 event, with Google being the most notable case where settlements may occur. They said they earned a couple million dollars from selling covered calls this quarter and will continue to pursue such opportunistic hedging.
"I believe it is really gonna be in 2027." — Kenneth A. Vecchione (CEO·CHAIR)
Q4 NII and deposit cost outlook
Q (Anthony Elian · JPMorgan): Analyst asked about NII being flat to slightly up in Q4 and expected change in interest-bearing deposit cost from 2.76% in Q3.
A: Management said Q4 typically has 3–4 bps NIM compression from seasonal warehouse outflows replaced by borrowings, but dollars of NII should be flat to slightly up Q3 to Q4 as the balance sheet grows and is remixed. They said interest-bearing deposit cost rose from 2.74% to 2.76% in Q3, saw September at about 2.81%, and expect deposits to rise another 10 to 15 bps with a 25-basis-point hike.
"Cost of interest bearing deposits to go up, call it, anywhere from 10 to 15 bps." — Vishal Idnani (CFO)